[Svnmerge] questions about merge tracking

[Blair Zajac]

Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Blair Zajac <blair at orcaware.com> wrote:
> 
>>One drawback of the proposal would be that the revision list stored in
>>the branches svnmerge-integrated subversion property would then become
>>sparse with only the commits on source location.
> 
> 
> I don't think this is going to happen: phantom revisions (that is, revisions
> which do not contain modifies on the head of the branch) will be
> automatically added to svnmerge-integrated next time you run "svnmerge
> merge", as if they were merged. This way, the property will stay compact.

OK, that sounds good.

Blair